Instructive exchange with a CYM youth

The Cork branch of the Connolly Youth Movement (CYM – youth group of the Communist Party of Ireland) briefly ran a series of open study groups in 2015, most of which I attended. After they decided to stop the meetings the closed Facebook group associated with the study group kept going with a small membership who occasionally post links to documents there.

A few days ago a member of the CYM posted a link to “The State: A Lecture Delivered at the Sverdlov University” by Lenin on July 11, 1919 (https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1919/jul/11.htm)

I made a comment that it was a shame that none of the political groups in Ireland today calling themselves socialist or communist have a programme which approaches anything like Lenin’s view on this central question of revolutionary politics.

This led to a bizarre exchange over the last couple of days with the CYM member who made the original post where he completely avoided responding to the political point I had made. Instead he went on a rant about how I was supposedly completely inactive politically in the workers’ movement. I responded with some facts about my activist record in Ireland while trying to draw him back to the actual politics – to no avail.

I post that Facebook exchange as a cautionary warning for anyone expecting anything like a rational discussion with members of the CYM.


Alex Homits
31 August at 02:19

The State: A Lecture Delivered at the Sverdlov University
Delivered: 11 July,1919
First Published: Pravda No. 15, January 18, 1929
Source: Lenin’s Collected Works, 4th English Edition, Progress Publishers, Moscow, 1972 Volume 29, pages 470-488

Seen by 15

Alan Gibson

“Whatever guise a republic may assume, however democratic it may be, if it is a bourgeois republic, if it retains private ownership of the land and factories, and if private capital keeps the whole of society in wage-slavery, that is, if the republic does not carry out what is proclaimed in the Programme of our Party and in the Soviet Constitution, then this state is a machine for the suppression of some people by others. And we shall place this machine in the hands of the class that is to overthrow the power of capital. We shall reject all the old prejudices about the state meaning universal equality—for that is a fraud: as long as there is exploitation there cannot be equality. The landowner cannot be the equal of the worker, or the hungry man the equal of the full man. This machine called the state, before which people bowed in superstitious awe, believing the old tales that it means popular rule, tales which the proletariat declares to be a bourgeois lie—this machine the proletariat will smash.”

Such a shame that none of the political groups in Ireland today calling themselves socialist or communist have a programme which lays out a strategy for smashing the capitalist state, instead they all present plans for winning a parliamentary majority and at best reforming the capitalist state.

Alex Homits
Your political organization exists on Skype. You’re not a member of a Trade Union. The community group(s) you were involved with don’t even let you onto their Facebook organizing page…

What is the purpose of being a “real Bolshevik Leninist” (as you claim and ascribe to yourself) if your political activity whatever it may be does not a) shift the balance of power in any shape or form towards the working class, b) does not organize or educate the working class and c) is completely limited to a computer screen?

Like the reason you come to these ultra–leftist positions is because you’re detached from reality behind a keyboard. If you weren’t you’d actually take into consideration the material conditions which shape the analysis of other political parties.

Do you not understand that whatever strategy you seem to be employing here is failing miserably?

Ultra leftism and purism is fantastic when you stand on the sideline and comment without actually participating in anything Alan Gibson and I think your analysis would change if your conditions were different, but anyway I’m sure you’ll disregard what I say regardless.

Alan Gibson
Three statements to start which are all wrong/lies.

“Your political organization exists on Skype.”

The organisation I support is indeed small but at a good number of the major demonstrations that have happened in Ireland over the past few years have seen real life IBT members distributing actual leaflets along with me.

Of course if we are playing the “my org is bigger than your org” game then why isn’t Alex a member of the SP or other larger reformist socialist group than the CPI?

“You’re not a member of a Trade Union.”

I am in fact not only a member of IMPACT but am the workplace rep where I work.

“The community group(s) you were involved with don’t even let you onto their Facebook organizing page…”

I am not an active member of Cobh CommUNITY for Change who do have a closed group. When I was an active member of Cobh Says No to Austerity there were both open and closed FB groups (the closed for security reasons when our community was actively organised in fighting meter installations).

My main political activity since being in Ireland has actually been with Cork Womens Right to Choose, now Cork Pro-Choice, which has always had an open FB page.

Anyone familiar with my political activity, no matter what they may think of my political views, will know that a statement that my political activity “is completely limited to a computer screen” is absurd.

My major regional and prominent national roles in the United Left Alliance project, the Pro-Choice movement and the Anti-Household/Water charges movements are all matters of public record.

I actually do believe that my involvement in these movements (not the ULA so much I will accept given that the SP control-freakery limited its impact) did indeed help shift the balance of power towards the working class.

I accept that as an individual my ability to “organise or educate the working class” is somewhat limited but I am prepared to stack my record on that up against most other political activists in Ireland today. Certainly I played a key role in helping Cobh provide the best organised opposition to water meter installations of any community in Ireland representing practical examples of the two things you say I do not do.

In terms of what any self-describing socialist activist has done in Ireland over the last decade I can fairly confidently state that I have actually “failed” less “miserably” than most in terms of helping move the working class closer to its historic task of overthrowing capitalism and establishing the rule of the working class along the general lines outlined in such major works of the revolutionary Marxist tradition like Lenin’s State and Revolution.

I could compare my record of political activism to yours Alex (and despite your repeated assertions to the contrary we both really know who would come out as actually more integrated into working class political struggles in Ireland over the last decade) but in terms of the correctness or otherwise of our political arguments what would it prove? Not much really.

Activism around immediate campaigns of our class is important but by itself my better record as a working class activist than you doesn’t prove anything about the correctness or otherwise of my claims to represent the politics of revolutionary Marxism in a strategic sense.

There is a slight caveat to that in that sometimes this can express itself in different perspectives within campaigns around immediate demands around issues of working class organisation.

As an example of this I am happy to stand on the record of my fight for my “ultra-left” perspectives (just the application of the ideas of the famous “ultra-left” tract State and Revolution) against the reformist bureaucratism of the SP/SWP in the anti-household charges regional and national organisations. The CPI was not a political factor of any influence in that mass working class campaign so I do not know if I would have had to fight against them as well but given the similar reformist socialist politics the CPI share with the SP/SWP I suspect I would have had to do so as well.

I know you come from the Stalinist tradition but this very crude kind of rewriting of history, and current reality, will be fooling no-one but yourself and presumably your more gullible comrades.

Perhaps that is the real point here. If you can repeat over and over to yourself this bizarre alternative reality where I am the non-activist that you outline that will somehow allow you to ignore my political arguments that consistently expose your organisations fake claims to represent the politics of revolutionary Marxism when in fact it is just standard reformist socialism.

Alex Homits
I don’t come from any tradition lmao the people who brought up Stalin at the MSG were you and your partner Anne.

Glad you’re a member of IMPACT.

Describe yourself what you want lol there is no point in ascribing to Marxism if you are incapable of acting on it


Alan Gibson
Keep repeating your mantra despite the facts. That is just like how the giants of the socialist movement approached the science of Marxism wasn’t it….

Anyway your rant was in response to a political comment that I made which by implication was criticising the CPI. If in fact I am wrong in saying “that none of the political groups in Ireland today calling themselves socialist or communist have a programme which lays out a strategy for smashing the capitalist state, instead they all present plans for winning a parliamentary majority and at best reforming the capitalist state.” it is quite a simple matter to prove me wrong without having to tell lies to yourself about my political activity.

Just point me to where any major CPI programmatic statement (like for instance your main current programmatic document “A Democratic Programme for the Twenty-First Century”) does in fact lay out a strategy for smashing the capitalist state.

Of course the real reason for your rant is that you are unable to do any such thing because my comment is completely accurate.

Just as the leader of your organisation was unable to respond to my political critique of the whole “Democratic Programme for the Twenty-First Century” (https://revolutionaryprogramme.wordpress.com/2016/01/09/republican-reformism-with-an-abstract-socialist-veneer-letter-to-the-cpi/) including a significant section on this very point.

Still why bother with substantive political discussion when you can make up lies about people and use that as an excuse not to engage instead.

Alex Homits
Delusions of grandeur are pretty funny tbh

Alan Gibson
Just facts as compared to your bald-faced lies.

But surprise, surprise, still no comment on the substantive political point.

Its simple – just point me to where in the Democratic programme for the Twenty-First Century (or similar major programmatic document by the CPI) the CPI lay out a strategy for smashing the capitalist state.

Lets not forget it is you who posted the piece by Lenin on the state.

Maybe your point was a subtle dig against Lenin for being so emphatic on this point which the CPI has nothing to say about?

Alex Homits
Lol man, you’re on a completely different planet altogether.

Alex Homits
Write all the long FB posts you want it’s not going to change anything for you

Alan Gibson
True enough.

Alan Gibson
I still have a decent enough record as an activist.

And I still keep exposing the programme of reformist socialists like the CPI in a way they can’t refute.

Alan Gibson
I was actually thinking about your point about education and it might make sense to post this thread more publicly (as this closed group has only a very small membership).

Letting a wider audience see what passes for political discussion between a member of the CYM and a revolutionary Marxist (or non-active “ultra-left” in your view) might have some educational value.

So I will be posting this thread on my blog (and thereby automatically to FB and Twitter).

As we have different audiences perhaps you can do likewise.

[At the time of this blog posting I do not know if Alex has chosen to also share this thread more widely]


0 Responses to “Instructive exchange with a CYM youth”

  1. Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




%d bloggers like this: